The group is suing on behalf of three white male, heterosexual law professors who submitted articles in the past and were ...

The lawsuit claims that the Michigan Law Review uses personal essays as a means to weed out straight white men seeking to join its staff.

Faculty, Alumni, & Students Opposed to Racial Preferences filed a federal lawsuit Wednesday against the Michigan Law Review.

The University of Michigan is being sued over allegations it illegally shuts out White, straight male applicants to its student law journal because of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) priorities.

A conservative legal group sued the University of Michigan’s flagship law journal on Wednesday, claiming its process for ...

A legal group opposed to racial and gender preferences in academia sued the University of Michigan’s law review and ...

A new lawsuit has been filed against the Michigan Law Review Association and the University of Michigan, along with several ...

FASORP unsuccessfully sued both the NYU Law Review and the Harvard Law Review in 2018, claiming both discriminate against white men when selecting members, editors and articles.

The University of Michigan’s (UM) law review journal is allegedly using illegal racial preferencing to achieve a “diverse” ...

FASORP inverts this concept to portray white men as victims, arguing that out of 21 interviews from 2021 to 2024, Northwestern gave offers to only three white men, a rate of 14%.

FASORP said it represents three anonymous white male professors whose articles were rejected and a second-year law student who claims his application to join the journal was denied due to race ...

FASORP previously tried to sue both New York University and Harvard Law Reviews in 2018 for similar claims of discrimination against white men. In both cases they were unsuccessful, ...