ICE, Patrick J. Schiltz and Federal
Digest more
This is a moment that calls for great courage. Federal trial and appellate judges must leave behind the safe harbor of timidity and lengthy footnotes and instead act boldly when the executive
Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. An officer conducts an inspection on the roadside, as the Court of Appeals temporarily halts FMCSA’s new rule on non-domiciled CDLs, keeping current licensing rules in place until the ...
Federal courts are part of the U.S. judicial system and handle cases involving national laws, the Constitution, and disputes between states or involving the federal government. They are separate from state courts and focus on issues under federal jurisdiction.
On Monday, Dec. 1, in Urias-Orellana v. Bondi, the Supreme Court will consider the federal judiciary’s role in asylum cases as it weighs whether a federal court of appeals must defer to the Board of Immigration Appeals’ judgment on an asylum seeker’s ...
Oakes Farms' fraud case against a former employee will remain in federal court. A federal judge rejected a motion to remand the case back to state court.
Judge Mark L. Wolf, writing in The Atlantic, said he was stepping down to speak out against the “assault on the rule of law” by President Trump, whom he accused of “targeting his adversaries.” By Mattathias Schwartz Mattathias Schwartz reports on ...
Jan 15 (Reuters) - A federal judicial panel's proposal to regulate the introduction of artificial intelligence-generated evidence at trial received a lukewarm reception on Thursday from corporate lawyers and class-action attorneys, who called it a well ...
This article is part of TPM Cafe, TPM’s home for opinion and news analysis. It was originally published at Balls and Strikes. With the Senate adjourned until 2026, the book is closed on President Donald Trump’s first-year judicial appointments.